Prime Directive:
Lies of Darwinism
I
suppose you've heard about the ridiculous
notion the Darwinists
have been spouting everywhere. You know, the whole "cloning causes fish
cells
to degrade" nonsense.They call it "Pattern Fading."
We call
it a
lie.
It is a lie; a blatant falsehood put together by
the
Darwinists in order to win people over to their side. To make people
believe that cloning is bad, they engineered a way to make the
cee-process look destructive!
The Darwinists' position is this: that each fish in the holo has been
cloned from the same fish, a different number of times - up to millions.
According to them, the cells inside the fish gradually become
unstable with excessive cloning, and soon the differences in genotype are
manifested in phenotype. The brighter fish in the holo have been cloned
less; the dimmer ones are the ones who were cloned billions of time. So,
the Darwinists say, cloning my be stopped!
We would agree, of
course, if this were true. But this evidence is
contrived. And we can prove it.
- First of all, we attempted to replicate the
results. We cloned the same fish millions of times, and watched what
happened. But to our surprise, nothing did! The millionth clone was just
as healthy as the first. You see, then, that is definite proof that the
Darwinists manipulated the data.
-
Now, take a look at their so-called "evidence". They claim that they
cannot show us the fish themselves. They claim that after a certain amount
of clonings, the fish simply disintegrated: their cells fell out of
synchrony with each other and the fish fell apart.
So - they cannot
show us
the evidence, they say, but they show us the above holo as "proof" of
their findings.
The holo appears legitimate at first glance. The
pixels have not been manipulated, and the picture appears untampered with.
But what about the obvious flaw?
Perhaps this is simply a
picture of
lots of different fish!
There remains no proof that all
of these
fish are
what the Darwinists SAY they are - countlessly-cloned and sick!
How can we believe the Darwinists' evidence to be anything but false? It
is a ploy engineered simply to provoke anti-cloning sentiments. Well, it
will not work. We shall make sure of it.
That, my friends, is
a
promise.
Last Modified: 5/2/98
Wendy Elizabeth
Kemp