[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re:

- To: "Jeff Hintz" <jhhintz@worldnet.att.net>, "Support Team (E-mail)" <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re:
- From: "robert" <robglobal@sprynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 16:44:40 -0800

    Hi,

    Good question...

    The work flow or "how to" method of writing GEMS docs is very important.  It
    makes sense to an election official/programmer because it most probably
    follows their current system and/or experience.  It can also be a good
    training tool.

    However, I also don't think that you will be able to get away from
    describing commands, fields, views, menus and buttons because eventually it
    will used for GEMS online help screens.

    So in my humble opinion, you may have to follow both methodologies.

    rob

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jeff Hintz <jhhintz@worldnet.att.net>
    To: Support Team (E-mail) <support@gesn.com>
    Date: Tuesday, February 09, 1999 3:44 PM

    >I am putting together the Operations Manual for GEMS and would like input
    in choosing between two options.  The old documentation follows two
    different logic patterns.  One way the guide follows the workflow of the
    election process.  The other way documents and defines according to the
    menu, fields or views.
    >
    >My preference is to lay out the info by process flow.
    >
    >Other opinions welcome.
    >
    >Rita Schweitz
    >Global Election Systems

- Follow-Ups:
  - RE: Docs Organization
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Accu-Vote Beta Release 1.95d
- Next by Date: RE: Docs Organization
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread