[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: 32 vs 128 cards

- To: <support@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: 32 vs 128 cards
- From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:55:31 -0700
- References: <LGEBJLEPICBGOLMNFIKCIEICCEAA.spdiebold@earthlink.net>

    Sue,

        Could you create a memory card that has the problem and send it to me.

    Tab

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Sue Page" <spdiebold@earthlink.net>
    To: "Support" <Support@dieboldes.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 2:24 PM
    Subject: FW: 32 vs 128 cards

    >
    > We ran into a problem with 128 MB cards today.  We were proofing ballots
    > with audio.  On a new 128 MB card with standard formatting, we experienced
    > audio problems.  The ends of many of the names and race headings were cut
    > off.  Instead of "Democrat" we heard "Democr".  The problem was
    experienced
    > in all 4 databases.
    >
    > We used a 32 MB card and had no audio problems.
    >
    > We used a new 128MB card, reformatted with FAT32, and had no audio
    problems.
    >
    >
    >
    > Sue Page
    > Maryland Project Manager
    > Diebold Election Systems, Inc.
    > suep@dieboldes.com
    > 410-286-2834
    > cell 443-404-9621
    >
    > https://www.mdvotes.org/
    >

- Follow-Ups:
  - RE: 32 vs 128 cards
    - From: "Sophia Lee" <sophia@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - FW: 32 vs 128 cards
    - From: "Sue Page" <spdiebold@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: FW: Maryland feedback
- Next by Date: RE: 32 vs 128 cards
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread