[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: California Presidential Preference rcr

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: California Presidential Preference rcr
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 10:00:51 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <00b701be7f49$6357a120$07d0fc9e@danno.GESDOMAIN>

    > Sorry, here's the formal request:
    >
    > Date due: in advance of CA primary, so about middle November, 1999
    > Counties: Humboldt, Tulare, Fresno (possibly others)

    This RCR is fairly high on the priority list, not so much because of
    California per-se, but because the request is similar to some requirements
    in Minnesota, Alabama, and Alaska.  Something should be ready for
    consumption in June if all things are equal.

    Your SOVC request is a bit frightful, but it has come up in another guise
    before.  Alaska's old "partial count" reports used to show multiple counter
    groups on the same SOVC report.  What is with these fruit-and-nut states
    anyway?

    The report changes will probably come more slowly than the counting changes
    (we can't even count like this currently).  After we have the counting
    complete and you guys have tried it out, it would probably be worth
    re-submitting an RCR for specific report changes you would like.  I would
    like to find some common ground between California and other states rather
    than maintain a suite of SOVC options just for them.

    Ken

- References:
  - California Presidential Preference rcr
    - From: "robert" <rcglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: California Presidential Preference rcr
- Next by Date: End Election and Cancel on TS
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread