[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Preference write-in tally setting

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: Preference write-in tally setting
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:53:35 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <00da01bf6784$8035d9a0$6103a8c0@tlincks.globalelection.com>

This is the whole point of the Preference write-in tally setting. Somewhere in the system, the user must be able to create a candidate of the type "no preference". I am advised this should be posted as a bug, not an rcr. Tyler There was a miscommunication in this advice. Is there any point in the "no preference" candidates other than the special write-in rule? Steve today brought up the possibility that that won't rotate in CA for example. Also, when? Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Preference write-in tally setting
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: New Hampshire cross-endorsement
- Next by Date: Re: Changes to the 194 usvm and 194 usma .abo files
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread