[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct

- To: "Bugtrack@Gesn. Com" <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct
- From: "Michael Lai" <mk_lai@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:04:31 -0800
- References: <NCBBKBBOCKMACPOAFCEHMEIDCPAA.mike@dieboldes.com>

Going to take this to development. ----- Original Message ----- From: Mike Brown To: Michael Lai ; Bugtrack@Gesn. Com Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 2:46 PM Subject: RE: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct GEMS should handle this. Mike Brown 1611 Wilmeth Road McKinney, TX 75069-8250 972.542.6000 800.433.8683 -----Original Message----- From: Michael Lai [mailto:mk_lai@dieboldes.com] Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 4:35 PM To: Bugtrack@Gesn. Com Subject: Re: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct The reason why Fitzroy is showing up in the "Adv Vote Ward 1" grouping is because the sortseq or the id (in GEMS) of Fitzroy is the same as "Adv Vote Ward 1". They are both 80. The report figures out the grouping by identifying reportunits with the same sortseq. If Fitzroy is changed to a unique sortseq (ie. 100) the report fixes itself.

- References:
  - RE: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct
    - From: "Mike Brown" <mike@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct
- Next by Date: Re: Landscape Ballots - Invalid Ballot
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread