[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Preference write-in tally setting

- To: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>, <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Preference write-in tally setting
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:25:21 -0800
- References: <NCBBIGGNCKBDKCCGPEOAEELKDCAA.ken@dieboldes.com>

It seems like the "none of the above" category differs from write-ins in that if its a Vote for Three, it doesn't get three "none of the above" lines, as a write-in line would. It is similar to the write-in in that it is not rotated (anywhere out west that I'm aware of). ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Clark To: rcr@dieboldes.com Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 2:53 PM Subject: RE: Preference write-in tally setting This is the whole point of the Preference write-in tally setting. Somewhere in the system, the user must be able to create a candidate of the type "no preference". I am advised this should be posted as a bug, not an rcr. Tyler There was a miscommunication in this advice. Is there any point in the "no preference" candidates other than the special write-in rule? Steve today brought up the possibility that that won't rotate in CA for example. Also, when? Ken

- References:
  - RE: Preference write-in tally setting
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Changes to the 194 usvm and 194 usma .abo files
- Next by Date: GBS Wisconsin and Illinois Requests
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread