[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Election Summary Report has 'Seperate Under' field option, that should not be there

- To: <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Election Summary Report has 'Seperate Under' field option, that should not be there
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:39:25 -0700
- References: <ILEPKGHAJJOGKGEDPHDDCEMECAAA.ravina@dieboldes.com>

Could you explain what the field means and why it shouldn't be there? Just curious. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ravina Dhami To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:45 PM Subject: Election Summary Report has 'Seperate Under' field option, that should not be there GEMS 1.18.9 The 'Election Summary Report' screen has an option called 'Seperate Under.' That option should not appear on the 'Election Summary Report' screen. Ravina

- Follow-Ups:
  - Re: Election Summary Report has 'Seperate Under' field option, that should not be there
    - From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - Election Summary Report has 'Seperate Under' field option, that should not be there
    - From: "Ravina Dhami" <ravina@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Statement of Votes Cast - Separate Under, row label name on the report is incorrect.
- Next by Date: Re: Race Editor - Selecting a different endorsement party for a candidate causes the rich text editor to default to the label name or the original saved value
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread