[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Central Count

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: Central Count
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 05:14:13 -0800
- References: <PPECJKNKLDJLKJPKPPIOGEINCIAA.ken@gesn.com>

I have located a shaman, recommended highly by the local tribal council. We are meeting tomorrow morning at sunrise to complete the appropriate rituals and prayers for our central count system. While not recommended by this particular shaman, I have decided to add human sacrifice to the ritual and am now reviewing prospective candidates. By tomorrow we should have all ballots blessed and cleansed of evil spirits and be ready for election day. I can now sleep well tonight. ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Clark To: support@gesn.com Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 4:44 PM Subject: RE: Central Count If the message is "BLANK CARD FEED" as opposed to "REJECT_BLANKCARD", then yep I've seen it before. Reader not calibrating. Out of our (ie, Global software development) control. As to why it does that, you'd need to ask Luc[r]id Technology. At $700 a pop, you would think they could fix this. Either that or the ballots are not properly consecrated. You might send a sample to our priest so he can tell you how many thousands of an inch out of spec they are. If you swap machines for a few years, you might settle into some golden units that don't exhibit the behavior as often. I believe that is how Pima mitigated the problem. Ken From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 6:14 AM Is anyone else running central count getting frequest "blank ballot"s when in fact the ballot is voted in each race??

- References:
  - RE: Central Count
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Central Count
- Next by Date: Re: Central Count
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread