[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Status of RCR for Wisconsin

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Status of RCR for Wisconsin
- From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 02:31:22 -0700
- References: <NFBBIBBCFKIGOCGDAHBHEEACCDAA.jhglobal@earthlink.net>

Jeff, The issue we have here is that the SOVC is a 'speadsheet' format report, with the precincts down the rows and the races/candidates across the columns. Therefore if a precinct has totals for a race then we must leave room in all races for that precinct. In the special case where a precinct (or race) does not have results in any race (or precinct) then we could perhaps not print the precinct (or race). This can also be achieved by using districts (or reporting set). I do not think it is possible to achieve what Wisconsin wants with the SOVC report. Tab ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Hintz To: Rcr List Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:26 AM Subject: Status of RCR for Wisconsin # Below is a copy of the RCR that I put out in November, along with a response from Ken Clark. Yes, it has been fixed to put out the dashes in 1.18, but they need to have only the Precincts that are involved with each race, no dashes or zeros. Thanks, Jeff # RE: SOVC Report - Jurisdiction Wide - Only report Reporting Precincts that are included in that Race To: <rcr@dieboldes.com> Subject: RE: SOVC Report - Jurisdiction Wide - Only report Reporting Precincts that are included in that Race From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:30:39 -0800 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <007301c171fd$e5551eb0$0903a8c0@home.net> This has been requested before actually. VTS used to put a dash for the races that don't fall in a precinct. Its really hard to do without killing performance. Right now we fill the array full of zeros and then fill in it with counters like a shotgun. SOVC doesn't currently know whether the race is in the precinct or not. Its not a trivial change, and I have a tough time chalking this up as a "bug". In other words it should go into 1.18. Is Wisconsin going to fail us over this? "Them thar races say zeee-ro". I mean really. Ken -----Original Message----- From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Jeff Hintz Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:00 PM To: Rcr List (E-mail) Subject: SOVC Report - Jurisdiction Wide - Only report Reporting Precincts that are included in that Race Jurisdiction: For GBS & Wisconsin, & All Accounts Date Requested: November 20, 2001 Date Required: February - 2002 The State of Wisconsin / Elections Board is requiring that we only report the Reporting Precincts that apply to each Race within the Jurisdiction Wide option. Currently we report all Reporting Precincts for each race, reporting them as 0, even if that Race is not defined within that Reporting Precinct. Could we make it a check box option, maybe just to suppress the Report Precin cts that are 0. Thanks, Jeff Jeff Hintz Diebold Election Systems 405 N. 115th Street Omaha, NE 68154 (402) 697-7171 office (402) 697-7166 fax (402) 871-3346 cell

- References:
  - Status of RCR for Wisconsin
    - From: "Jeff Hintz" <jhglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Re: SOVC - Cumulatively Tally Precincts With Under Five Ballots Cast In EV/Absentee - For Texas
- Next by Date: Re: Status of RCR for Wisconsin
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread