[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Placing candidate text under oval

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: Re: Placing candidate text under oval
- From: "Greg Forsythe" <gfglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:22:16 -0400
- References: <PPECJKNKLDJLKJPKPPIOMENBCOAA.ken@dieboldes.com>

I look forward with enthusiasm to getting this working. There are only 8 counties out of 65 in the New York State that count absentees with optical scan, 3 with punch cards and the rest manually. Legislation is changing to uncertified the punch card and to change from "excuse" to "no excuse" for absentees. Then we go after the precinct counters. Thanks Ken. I should have read your previous response more carefully. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Clark To: rcr@dieboldes.com Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:15 PM Subject: RE: Placing candidate text under oval 1.18.1 is the trick. Ken -----Original Message----- From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Greg Forsythe Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:06 AM To: rcr@dieboldes.com Subject: Re: Placing candidate text under oval Will the system accept a minus quantity? Is there a trick to it? ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Clark To: rcr@dieboldes.com Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 12:40 PM Subject: RE: Placing candidate text under oval A simple, perhaps dirty, approach to this is to allow negative candidate margins. In your example below, you would choose right candidate margin of - 1/4", and this would expand the candidate area into the oval area. This is now done, and will be in 1.18.1. A release date for 1.18 hasn't been set yet, but will probably happen some time this month. Ken

- References:
  - RE: Placing candidate text under oval
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Placing candidate text under oval
- Next by Date: Re: Ability To Have User Set Defaults For The Election Summary Report
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread