[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: AccuVote Tapes Results Report

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: AccuVote Tapes Results Report
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:01:33 -0800
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <018301c1ae87$85852cc0$81d9fc9e@default>

Why not respond with when you need this request completed? Ken -----Original Message----- From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:56 PM To: rcr@dieboldes.com Subject: Re: AccuVote Tapes Results Report Ken, why waste your time responding at all? ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Clark To: rcr@dieboldes.com Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: RE: AccuVote Tapes Results Report From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:54 AM To: rcr@dieboldes.com Subject: AccuVote Tapes Results Report Importance: High Please don't do that. California counties want to have an AccuVote report that prints only the label and a Precinct No. and Vote Totals for the precinct. NO Races/Candidates. Just the precinct and total ballots cast. Can this be done relatively quickly? Relative to what. There are several sites that want to have the shorter report. THIS IS FOR THE RESULTS REPORT ONLY. Let me know if we can't do this? We can do just about anything. Maybe we have this and I'm not aware of it. Haven't heard of it myself. Ken

- Follow-Ups:
  - RE: AccuVote Tapes Results Report
    - From: Mark S Earley <meglobal@earthlink.net>

- References:
  - Re: AccuVote Tapes Results Report
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Re: AccuVote Tapes Results Report
- Next by Date: RE: AccuVote Tapes Results Report
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread