[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Audit Viewer

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: Audit Viewer
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 16:21:22 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <01BE4EBE.91B3B920@electioncentral>

    > From:	Jeff Hintz [mailto:jhhintz@worldnet.att.net]
    > Sorry, I should have explained better.
    >
    > Currently, as the Accu-Touch is being voted on, the images
    > (results), are recorded in the order that they are voted.  When
    > you print out the images, they are in the same order.  Therefore
    > it is necessary to scramble the order of the images, so you
    > cannot identify how a voter voted.

    Thanks.  I assumed this but wanted to make sure before I commented.

    Long term, I think that the order needs to be scrambled as it is recorded,
    not as it is reported.  This is what the AccuVote does for Cambridge
    preference voting.

    Ken

- Prev by Date: Re: Audit Viewer
- Next by Date: Re: Race Label on LCD (was RE: Jefferson County, KY)
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread