[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Testing sb100 database 1.14.2 (asap please)

- To: "SUPPORT (E-mail)" <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: RE: Testing sb100 database 1.14.2 (asap please)
- From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:38:52 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <005a01bf58bc$6353de80$d3a6b2d1@default>

    > Do you all think it would be a good idea to get Jeff Dean to send us 10 or
    > so precincts by eight parties with pre-printed test decks from one of the
    > California sites for Jane to test AccuVote and CC????  If so,
    > I'll call Jeff
    > Dean and set up asap.

    *Any* testing we can do on 1.14 is a good idea.  With the risk of sounding
    alarmist, 1.14 really needs more testing.  Even though much of GEMS looks
    the same from the outside, the guts changed substantially between 1.11 and
    1.14.  That's why you see all kinds of things completely unrelated to shadow
    races broken in the early 1.14 releases.

    Hats off to everyone posting 1.14 bug reports.

    Ken

- References:
  - Re: Testing sb100 database 1.14.2 (asap please)
    - From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>

- Prev by Date: Re: Testing sb100 database 1.14.2 (asap please)
- Next by Date: RE: AVTS Pollbook Question
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread