[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
- From: "Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 21:37:27 -0700
- References: <NDBBJBKEHMHBEPDMLKOLOENICDAA.ljdglobal@gesn.com>

    Frank backed off. 1.94r
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Larry Dix <ljdglobal@gesn.com>
    To: <support@gesn.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 3:44 PM
    Subject: RE: Washoe County Firmware Revision level

    > What is the final answer on the firmware.  I would like to update this
    data,
    > but want good accurate data.
    >
    >
    > Larry J. Dix
    > Global Election Systems
    > (972)-542-6000
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-support@gesn.com [mailto:owner-support@gesn.com]On Behalf Of
    > Steve Knecht
    > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 9:32 AM
    > To: support@gesn.com
    > Subject: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
    >
    > Why do you say this?
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: <Fkglobal@aol.com>
    > To: <support@gesn.com>
    > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 7:05 AM
    > Subject: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
    >
    >
    > > Ian -
    > >
    > > I think it would be best to send their new units with 1.94w.
    > >
    > > Thanks
    > >
    > > - Frank
    > >
    >
    >

- References:
  - RE: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
    - From: "Larry Dix" <ljdglobal@gesn.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
- Next by Date: RE: HTML file to the internet during an Election
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread