[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level

- To: <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
- From: "Ian Piper" <ian@gesn.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 09:23:11 -0500
- References: <7c.53f1fed.2649751b@aol.com>

Not according to Tari. She says they should stick with what currently exists (1.94r). If you differ with that opinion, please let me know soon, as we are about to ship them today. If I don't hear from you or Tari by noon today, I will ship with 1.94r. Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: Fkglobal@aol.com To: support@gesn.com Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 9:05 AM Subject: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level Ian - I think it would be best to send their new units with 1.94w. Thanks - Frank

- References:
  - Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
    - From: Fkglobal@aol.com

- Prev by Date: RE: GEMS 1.16.1 AccuVote-TS Options
- Next by Date: Re: Washoe County Firmware Revision level
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread