[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: Different column layouts on AVTS system.

- To: <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: Different column layouts on AVTS system.
- From: "Frank Kaplan" <fkglobal@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:39:04 -0700
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <007a01c095f4$f9532af0$1404a8c0@dieboldes.com>

Tab- We need to have a work around for Jeff H to use for the Johnson County demo taking place next week. Please see what you can do. Thanks - FK -----Original Message----- From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Talbot Iredale Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 12:42 PM To: rcr@dieboldes.com Subject: Re: Different column layouts on AVTS system. This will be supported in the new AVTS unit. It will support the same layout options and the paper ballot. Therefore you will be able to specify that the question requires 3 columns on a 3 column ballot. Tab ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Hintz To: Rcr List (E-mail) Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 9:53 AM Subject: Different column layouts on AVTS system. Date Requested: February 13, 2001 Requested By: Johnson County, Ka nsas - Demonstration - RFP - (Per Frank Kaplan) Date Needed: By end of day February 14, 2001 Description: The ability to layout a ballot on the AVTS system, doing multiple columns for part of the ballot, and just 1 column for big questions. Motivation: N eeded to be able to possibly secure a contract with Johnson County, Kansas. Jeff Hintz Global Election Systems

- Follow-Ups:
  - RE: Different column layouts on AVTS system.
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- References:
  - Re: Different column layouts on AVTS system.
    - From: "Talbot Iredale" <tiredale@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: Re: Different column layouts on AVTS system.
- Next by Date: Re: Write-in Line To Be Moved To The Lowest Position If Candidate Spacing Is More Than 1
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread