[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# RE: GEMS question - Alpha Numeric ID's

- To: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>, "Rcr@Gesn. Com" <rcr@dieboldes.com>
- Subject: RE: GEMS question - Alpha Numeric ID's
- From: "Mike Brown" <mike@dieboldes.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:48:59 -0600
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <NCBBIGGNCKBDKCCGPEOACEDPDEAA.ken@dieboldes.com>

    That's what I said.  She wants the ID to be alpha numeric, not the Label.

    Mike Brown
    1611 Wilmeth Road
    McKinney, TX 75069-8250
    972.542.6000
    800.433.8683

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Ken Clark [mailto:ken@dieboldes.com]
    Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 10:34 AM
    To: Rcr@Gesn. Com
    Subject: RE: GEMS question - Alpha Numeric ID's

    > I have a question for you.  Is there an ability in GEMS to assign an
    > alpha-numeric number to the default precinct category?  If there is not an
    > ability to assign an alpha-numeric number, is there a possibility of
    > revising GEMS to allow that?

    Not sure I follow.  This is what the report precinct label is for no?

    Ken

- References:
  - RE: GEMS question - Alpha Numeric ID's
    - From: "Ken Clark" <ken@dieboldes.com>

- Prev by Date: RE: GEMS question - Alpha Numeric ID's
- Next by Date: RE: warning in ballot edior to prevent covering oval with race or header
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread