[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

# Re: Piedmont Election - Uploading results and Network connections

- To: <ken@gesn.com>, <support@gesn.com>
- Subject: Re: Piedmont Election - Uploading results and Network connections
- From: "Thomas Goetzinger" <tgoetzinger@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 10:13:59 -0600

    I am heading out to help Jeff this morning resolve these problems if I can.
    I agree that he should kill the netbuei, ipx/spx, etc. although each
    protocol has specific uses and shouldn't conflict with TCP/IP.  I think the
    real issue is how the TCP/IP address is resolved.  DNS, DHCP, and plain host
    lookup can be used.  I think just hardcoding the IPs and resolving them via
    hosts table will be the most expedient solution.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Ken Clark <ken@gesn.com>
    To: Support Team (E-mail) <support@gesn.com>
    Date: Monday, February 15, 1999 9:04 AM
    Subject: RE: Piedmont Election - Uploading results and Network connections

    >> Wins numbers.  The Server is set up with TCP/IP, NetBEUI, and
    >> NWLink IPX/SPX / Netbios, ID is Gems and Workgroup is Dilbert, IP
    >
    >On a slight tangent to this thread, GEMS servers should be set up with the
    >TCP/IP protocol only.  It is possible to run other stacks, however doing so
    >can cause strange interactions with domain name lookups, and can cause
    extra
    >traffic to be sent over the RAS connection.  On a LAN, performance is much
    >better if you just run TCP/IP.
    >
    >Ken
    >
    >

- Prev by Date: FW: Piedmont Election - Uploading results and Network connections
- Next by Date: RE: Piedmont Election - Uploading results and Network connections
- Index(es):
  - Chronological
  - Thread